this should be the final nail, right?
while there is simply no acceptable excuse nor valid reason whatsoever to betray our country and our fellow americans by casting an intolerable and misguided vote for george bush in the presidential election later this year, some and perhaps even the majority of those who say they'll cast that reprehensible vote, say they'll do so because we'd be safer under bush as a result of his tough stance against terrorism (and which planet are these lost souls from again?)well, it is the duty of the rest of us to correct their misunderstanding, to help them overcome the prejudice inherent in partisanship and disavow them of the misrepresentations and falsehoods disseminated by propaganda and public relations stunts.
to help us along, richard clarke, former white house security expert has accused bush of doing a terrible job of tackling terrorism having even ignored warnings of the threat from al-qaeda before the 11 september 2001 attacks.
«find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism - he ignored it.» ~richard clarke on cbs' 60 Minutes.
