arguments end in the case against israel's wall of shame
«for a tribunal more accustomed to solving boundary disputes between niger and benin, or determining whether pedra branca and pulau batu puteh belong to malaysia or singapore, yesterday's hearing was extraordinary.»question: if israel decides it should literally build a wall to protect itself from terrorist attacks (which to some are just necessary acts of war), instead of ending its occupation of palestine, why doesn't it build it in its own territory?
Labels: Politics
